We all have that one "Single Source of Truth" confluence page that hasn't been updated since 2021. The problem isn't your engineers; it's the tool. Traditional wikis fail because they are static destinations isolated from your actual work. We explore why context switching kills documentation culture and how we are using Knowledge Graphs at Syncally to make documentation live alongside your code. Syncally Let’s be honest for a second. When was the last time you excitedly opened your company’s internal wiki? If you are like most developers, the answer is "never." You open it because you have to. You open it to find an API key, a setup guide, or a decision record, only to find that the page was last updated by a guy named Dave who left the company three years ago. The traditional approach to knowledge management in engineering—the "Wiki"—is broken. It treats knowledge as a static artifact to be filed away in a dusty cabinet. But code is living, breathing, and constantly changing. At Syncally, we realized that trying to force dynamic engineering work into static wiki pages is why so many teams suffer from "Documentation Rot." Here is why the old way fails and the new way we are building for. Syncally The "Destination" Problem The biggest issue with tools like Confluence, Notion, or generic knowledge bases is that they are destinations. destinations To document something, you have to: Stop coding.
Switch tabs (Context Switch #1).
Log in to the wiki.
Find the right folder.
Write the doc.
Switch back to code (Context Switch #2). Stop coding. Switch tabs (Context Switch #1). Log in to the wiki. Find the right folder. Write the doc. Switch back to code (Context Switch #2). That friction is enough to kill any documentation habit. Research shows that it takes about 23 minutes to regain focus after an interruption. If you ask an engineer to "update the wiki" five times a day, you have effectively destroyed their deep work for the entire afternoon. The Fix: Bring Knowledge to the Workflow. We built Syncally as a Unified Workspace because we believe knowledge should live where the work happens. You shouldn't have to leave your environment to explain why you made a decision. The Fix: Bring Knowledge to the Workflow. Unified Workspace why Imagine if, instead of writing a separate doc, your Slack discussion about a bug fix was automatically linked to the GitHub Pull Request that solved it. That is what we call Automatic Context Linking. Automatic Context Linking The "Context Gap" Wikis are great for storing What (e.g., "Here is the architecture diagram"). They are terrible at storing Why. What Why Six months from now, when you look at a piece of gnarly code, the wiki might tell you what the module does. But it won't tell you that you chose this specific library because the VP of Engineering vetoed the other one during a heated Zoom call in Q3. what That context—the Why—is lost in the ether of closed Zoom windows and buried Slack threads. Why The Fix: The Knowledge Graph. This is where we diverge from the standard "search bar" approach. Syncally uses a Knowledge Graph to map the relationships between your tools. The Fix: The Knowledge Graph. Knowledge Graph Instead of a flat list of documents, we map entities like this: {
  "entity": "PR-402",
  "type": "Pull Request",
  "relationships": [
    {
      "type": "SOLVES",
      "target": "Jira-101 (Fix Latency)"
    },
    {
      "type": "DISCUSSED_IN",
      "target": "Slack-Thread-882 (Ops Channel)"
    },
    {
      "type": "DECIDED_IN",
      "target": "Zoom-Meeting-Recording-Sept-12"
    }
  ]
} {
  "entity": "PR-402",
  "type": "Pull Request",
  "relationships": [
    {
      "type": "SOLVES",
      "target": "Jira-101 (Fix Latency)"
    },
    {
      "type": "DISCUSSED_IN",
      "target": "Slack-Thread-882 (Ops Channel)"
    },
    {
      "type": "DECIDED_IN",
      "target": "Zoom-Meeting-Recording-Sept-12"
    }
  ]
} By using a graph, we don't just store data; we store the connective tissue between your decisions. When you ask Syncally's AI, "Why did we merge PR-402?", it doesn't just grep for keywords. It traverses the graph to tell you: "It was merged to fix the latency issue discussed in the Ops channel on Sept 12th." connective tissue "It was merged to fix the latency issue discussed in the Ops channel on Sept 12th." Trust vs. Verification Another reason wikis become graveyards is trust. Once you encounter one outdated doc, you stop trusting all docs. You start DMing people instead. "Hey, is this setup guide still valid?" all This creates a hidden tax on your senior engineers. They become human routers, constantly answering questions that should be in the documentation but aren't trusted. should The Fix: AI-Powered Freshness Because Syncally connects to your live tools (GitHub, Jira, Calendar), it knows when things change. If a piece of code linked to a decision record is heavily refactored, the system knows that the decision record is likely stale. The Fix: AI-Powered Freshness We are working on features that flag this "drift" automatically. You shouldn't have to manually verify every page; your tool should tell you, "Hey, the code this document describes has changed 40% in the last month. Is this still accurate?" "Hey, the code this document describes has changed 40% in the last month. Is this still accurate?" Stop Treating Knowledge Management as a Chore The "GetGuru" philosophy of "knowledge in your workflow" was a great start for general business teams (Sales, CX). But engineering is different. Our "workflow" isn't just a browser tab; it's a complex web of commits, deployments, and standups. We are building Syncally for the Overwhelmed CTO and the Tool-Fatigued Tech Lead. We want to stop the context switching and let you focus on shipping code, trusting that the system is capturing the context for you. Overwhelmed CTO Tool-Fatigued Tech Lead If you are tired of being the only person who knows how the legacy auth service works, it might be time to stop writing wiki pages and start building a knowledge graph.

This story contains AI-generated text. The author has used AI either for research, to generate outlines, or write the text itself. 

Why Your Engineering Wiki is a Graveyard (And How to Fix It)

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

From Static Docs to Living Knowledge Graphs: Fixing Engineering Documentation

A Day In The Life of an Obsessive Note Taker

Amazon Neptune Launches a New Analytics Engine and the One Graph Vision

Buckle Up and Enjoy Some Graph Therapy

Determining Communities In Graphs Using Label Propagation Algorithm

Foursquare Enters the Future With a Geospatial Knowledge Graph

From Static Docs to Living Knowledge Graphs: Fixing Engineering Documentation

A Day In The Life of an Obsessive Note Taker

Amazon Neptune Launches a New Analytics Engine and the One Graph Vision

Buckle Up and Enjoy Some Graph Therapy

Determining Communities In Graphs Using Label Propagation Algorithm

Foursquare Enters the Future With a Geospatial Knowledge Graph

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps